Thousands of restaurant and bar owners across the country have faced lawsuits for alleged TV signal or cable piracy. These cases usually involve showing pay-per-view programs like UFC fights, boxing matches, or other sports events in their establishments without paying the commercial rate for broadcast rights.
Any company with rights to a specific UFC fight or TV program can sue. Most lawsuits are filed by Joe Hand Productions or G & G Closed Circuit Events. Plaintiffs often present strong evidence, like surveillance footage from private investigators. Sometimes, they use written affidavits from these investigators. When evidence is scarce, affidavits from restaurant staff and patrons can be key in challenging the plaintiff’s claims. Even when it’s clear an illegal broadcast happened, attorney Glenn Wright often negotiates minimal settlements due to his expertise.
Consequences for Pay-Per-View Events or Cable Piracy
The law heavily favors plaintiffs, requiring mandatory awards of attorney’s fees and costs to the winner and enforcing strict liability. This means even if the defendants didn’t intentionally steal a TV signal, they are still liable if the program was shown without proper payment. Damages can exceed $100,000 if intentional theft is proven. Defendants might face liabilities far beyond the broadcast’s cost and can be personally liable even if they operate under a business entity like a corporation.
Statutes 47 U.S.C. §605 and 47 U.S.C. §553 cover TV signal and cable piracy. Plaintiffs often add claims like theft of services and copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. §101. These cases are usually heard in federal courts, where many attorneys lack specific procedural experience. However, Glenn Wright specializes in these lawsuits and knows federal court practices well.
Damages in TV signal and cable piracy cases can be substantial, influenced by repeated violations, intent to profit, actual profit, extent of the broadcast, and the number of patrons. Glenn Wright can analyze your case, estimate a reasonable settlement range, and advise on whether going to trial is in your best interest. This potential for a fair settlement can offer hope in an otherwise tough situation.
Time to Act is when a Pre-Litigation Demand Letter is Received
If you’ve received a pre-litigation demand letter accusing you of unauthorized broadcasting, contact Glenn Wright to discuss your situation. Even if you believe you’re innocent, addressing the issue early with a solid defense can simplify resolution before litigation starts. This early action emphasizes the urgency and importance of your situation.
Immediate action is crucial if you’ve been served with a summons and complaint for TV signal or cable piracy. Contact Glenn Wright promptly, as the time to respond in federal court is limited. Failing to act quickly could result in a default judgment against you.
No matter your situation, attorney Glenn Wright has the expertise and experience to successfully resolve your TV signal piracy case.